A Free Forum
For A Free People

---

What do you think of Henry Kissinger's 'New World Order' comments?

	Ridiculous. There's no New World Order, and there never will be
	The so-called New World Order exists only in the minds of conspiracy nutjobs
	The countries of this world are too disjointed to agree to give up sovereignty
	Just the nonsensical ramblings of a senile dinosaur
	The world desperately needs something new, since its existing structures have failed
	Like it or not, there needs to be world governance if we're ever to achieve global peace
	If anyone were to be able to unite the world, it seems like Obama could do it
	There already is a New World Order, and it's not that new
	Not a surprise from Kissinger, he's obviously singing the tune of his fellow puppet masters
	It's obvious Kissinger knows something the rest of us don't
	Kissinger is right, the final New World Order is about to be thrust upon us
	Bible prophecy seems to suggest one-world government is coming, so that means it's coming
	Other

Please login to submit your poll response:
Email:
Password:
First time here? Click here to register Lost your password? Click here

PLEASE NOTICE:
Posted by Mikaia (mbmonitor) on Feb 04, 2009 09:27

We have 10 visible forums to post to on the WND Polls Home page. We also have 10 or more forums on the WND Forums Home page.

There is no reason to post on the forums that are not active on WND. I will no longer approve of the posts for discussion that are not visible on WND Poll page.

Please take advantage of the forums that are active.


Mikaia
mbmonitor@wnd.com
http://wnd.com

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kissinger
Posted by bob on Jan 13, 2009 15:40

AFI, If you want the truth about the New World Order don't look to the Bible for answers look to the Iron Mountain Accords. Read it then voice an opinion of the New World Order. Their first stated objective is to reduce the population of the world by one half,"to be more in harmony with nature". The refer to blacks as irrelavancies,senior citizens as useless eaters and white male Christians as dissidents. Kissinger and his cabal organized this meeting and he was a key speaker.
I would suggest that if you are going to join in a discussion that you at least learn some facts.
Bob
I suggest that you read the article in WND today 1-16-09 on Kissingers remarks on the New World Order.

Reply to: AFI
Okay so because I say that these world leaders are not talking about the same new world order as the conspiracy theorist you accuse me of being “a scoffer re The End Times, and God's Plan of Salvation and The Rapture.”? If you are going to accuse me of that then cite the verse in the bible that uses the term New world order, and show how that is identical to the new world order that we are talking about here. The problem is that you and others are citing explanations of what this new world order is going to be, and what it is going to do. Then when politicians use the term, everyone instantly says that they are part of the conspiracy. In many ways we already have a new world order threw the UN, and that is hardly identical to the conspiracy theory that we are talking about. So begin you start accusing Kissinger and me how about you look at what we actually support.

RE: If you Think it can
Posted by AFI on Jan 12, 2009 10:25

Alex Jones is completely un-credible. For one thing he is also a 9-11consperatist and it is a key part of his conspiracies regarding a new world order. He is the last person anyone should be listening to when it comes to a new world order. conspiracy theories from him, and by people like him are largely responsible for the misinformation on the subject and why many people respond so negatively when they hear the team new world order. It has a negative connotation when it does not have to have one. A new world order is not inherently evil; those who support one should not be so criticized.

Reply to: flame fighter
If you think it is joke you should watch a documentary by Alex Jones The End Game. After watching it then make your own decisions.

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kissinger
Posted by el351600 on Jan 12, 2009 09:43

Thank you for responding to my post. The goal is socalism controled by a central one world government. Actually Obama is on board with that too.
He has created the post of climate tzar and wants to make a cabinet level job. So who is his pick ? a one world advocate Carol M Browner .She is one of the leaders of The Comission For a Sustainable World one of that groups stated goals is World Governance and world wide socialism. There are many notable people in that One World Cabal Britains Tony Blair is another he is the soon to be president of the EU.

Reply to: AFI
Okay so because I say that these world leaders are not talking about the same new world order as the conspiracy theorist you accuse me of being “a scoffer re The End Times, and God's Plan of Salvation and The Rapture.”? If you are going to accuse me of that then cite the verse in the bible that uses the term New world order, and show how that is identical to the new world order that we are talking about here. The problem is that you and others are citing explanations of what this new world order is going to be, and what it is going to do. Then when politicians use the term, everyone instantly says that they are part of the conspiracy. In many ways we already have a new world order threw the UN, and that is hardly identical to the conspiracy theory that we are talking about. So begin you start accusing Kissinger and me how about you look at what we actually support.

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kissinger
Posted by AFI on Jan 12, 2009 07:36

Okay so because I say that these world leaders are not talking about the same new world order as the conspiracy theorist you accuse me of being “a scoffer re The End Times, and God's Plan of Salvation and The Rapture.”? If you are going to accuse me of that then cite the verse in the bible that uses the term New world order, and show how that is identical to the new world order that we are talking about here. The problem is that you and others are citing explanations of what this new world order is going to be, and what it is going to do. Then when politicians use the term, everyone instantly says that they are part of the conspiracy. In many ways we already have a new world order threw the UN, and that is hardly identical to the conspiracy theory that we are talking about. So begin you start accusing Kissinger and me how about you look at what we actually support.

Reply to: el351600
In modern times this has been openly talked about since Woodrow Wiloson helped form The League of Nations: It has never been a secret! The League of Nations failed. We had a Second World War that resulted in the death of over 500 million people and the distruction of the industrial capasity of Europe, The USSR and Japan. The result was the formation of the UN in 1946-47. The UN is a world body and is the fore runner of the One World Government.That body already controls much of what happens in the world and it is decidedly socialist. The Core leadership in The UN want a One World Government and most leaders of the member nations along with very wealthy families and industrailists want control over the population of the world. That too is no secret. The world will be promised peace,safety, freedom from fear,freedom from want ( ie lack of food and housing) the promise will be equel treatment as outlined in The UN Rights of Man. Check out The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rirhts. That will be the founding doccument of The NWO. It actually sounds better than Our Bill of Rirhts.
A One World Government run By The Man of Evil will come about in The End Times. You seem to be a scoffer re The End Times, and God's Plan of Salvation and The Rapture. Will you be Left Behind?

Bill

If you Think it can't Happen
Posted by flame fighter on Jan 11, 2009 14:59

If you think it is joke you should watch a documentary by Alex Jones The End Game. After watching it then make your own decisions.

RE: RE: The time is almost ripe, Kissinger...
Posted by Lutz on Jan 10, 2009 14:55

Kissinger and the like are dependent upon the gullibility of its citizens, if they are to continue to remain in power.

Fortunately I don't have to lecture anyone about this evil man and his global agenda.

In this day and age, information on any key figure is only a key stroke away.

Thanks...

Reply to: gh123
Seems to me its important to remember that it is possible to want some sort of international economic cooperation without being demonic or a tool of Satan. There are well-meaning people who truly believe that some sort of global, international effort is necessary to address global challenges, and that these things can be addressed while ensuring, if not improving, peoples' level of freedom and standard of living. This is not a bad goal. It is the end - where there is some sort of one-world government forced upon us by the anti-Christ - that is evil. And according to the Bible, this is inevitable. So, don't blame folks like Kissinger....fight his ideas, yes, but give the guy a little credit. He's lived through fascism in his lifetime - the likelihood that he is looking to impose it on the rest of the world is pretty slim. In short, Henry doesn't have a clue, its true, but neither is he evil. Its wrong to infer evil motives to everyone you don't agree with.

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kissinger
Posted by Zcats on Jan 09, 2009 12:33

Most do not know it but, LOC-90-91468 " The World Conspiracy" has all the details of how this has been taking place ...since late 1700s !!

Zcats

Reply to: AFI
no I am not ready to cooperate with all of that, but then again neither do any of the other people who are speaking in favor of a new world order. Again you are taking what you think new world order means, and inserting it as a definition for what Henry Kissinger and others are saying. Just because they say new world order doesn’t mean that they support what you described. And that is the problem with the bulk of the responses on this thread. People are responding to what they think new world order is not what Henry Kissinger says he supports.

RE: RE: RE: RE: Kissinger
Posted by el351600 on Jan 09, 2009 08:54

In modern times this has been openly talked about since Woodrow Wiloson helped form The League of Nations: It has never been a secret! The League of Nations failed. We had a Second World War that resulted in the death of over 500 million people and the distruction of the industrial capasity of Europe, The USSR and Japan. The result was the formation of the UN in 1946-47. The UN is a world body and is the fore runner of the One World Government.That body already controls much of what happens in the world and it is decidedly socialist. The Core leadership in The UN want a One World Government and most leaders of the member nations along with very wealthy families and industrailists want control over the population of the world. That too is no secret. The world will be promised peace,safety, freedom from fear,freedom from want ( ie lack of food and housing) the promise will be equel treatment as outlined in The UN Rights of Man. Check out The UN Universal Declaration of Human Rirhts. That will be the founding doccument of The NWO. It actually sounds better than Our Bill of Rirhts.
A One World Government run By The Man of Evil will come about in The End Times. You seem to be a scoffer re The End Times, and God's Plan of Salvation and The Rapture. Will you be Left Behind?

Bill

Reply to: AFI
Exactly. world leaders and American politicians are all talking about this same new world order. Let me ask you, If this new world order is one and the same as the one conspiracy theorists talk about that is secretly behind everything then why would we hear these leaders openly talking about it? The very fact that we have all these world leaders that you mentioned talking about a New world order shows that it is not the same thing as the new world order that many hear are concerned about, but rather it is about Global cooperation. Global cooperation on many issues is a good thing and not something that we should oppose. Lastly people have been talking about the rapture since ever since Christ re-ascended into heaven. Let’s not oppose that can be a good thing, simply because we associate it with the end times, because there is a good chance that were wrong, and we are not in the end times, in which case we would have opposed this plan for nothing.

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Kissinger
Posted by cr366184 on Jan 08, 2009 21:28

Now that is interesting.
Since you are the authority on what Kissenger thinks and wants in a NWO maybe you would like to tell us what he wants along with what all the other supporters want in a NWO?
Then we can understand better what the plans of the elite have for us poor ignorant souls who live in a torn world.

Reply to: AFI
no I am not ready to cooperate with all of that, but then again neither do any of the other people who are speaking in favor of a new world order. Again you are taking what you think new world order means, and inserting it as a definition for what Henry Kissinger and others are saying. Just because they say new world order doesn’t mean that they support what you described. And that is the problem with the bulk of the responses on this thread. People are responding to what they think new world order is not what Henry Kissinger says he supports.