A Free Forum
For A Free People

Founded 1997 | WND Forums Home | WND Polls Home | November 21, 2009


COVERAGE YOU CAN'T COUNT ON
Why are some national media finally reporting on Obama's eligibility?


Read Related Story


<< Return to main polls page

Why are some national media finally reporting on Obama's eligibility?

Now that Obama's in office, they don't think there's any chance of the truth preventing him from serving
The issue has so clearly been resolved in so many people's minds, the media can now expose the "Birthers" for the nutjobs they are
They're just starting to get frightened enough that they feel they have to condemn and marginalize those that question Obama
They're merely trying to humiliate news agencies that are covering it as a genuine concern
It was a slow news day, and wacko conspiracies make for juicy headlines
The issue doesn't have any merit, but the rumors are loud enough they can't be dismissed any longer
They're just trying to shake off the last of the conspiracies, so Obama can get to business fixing this country
They're doing it solely for ratings, as it's a hot-button issue citizens are concerned about
The obligatory coverage of CPAC woke up the media enough to recognize not everyone adores Obama
They figure it has to get covered in some form eventually
I don't care about the reason, as long as the issue stays on the front burner
I'm not sure why, but I hope larger news agencies pick up on it
Some in the news media are beginning to realize the issue has merit
They're beginning to understand it's a legitimate issue
The country is in serious trouble, and they're finally realizing it's now or never to cover it
Other

Please login to submit your poll response:
Email:
Password:
First time here? Click here to register
Lost your password? Click here





Frequently asked questions about Daily Poll.

IMPORTANT: WND requires e-mail registration only to ensure that our poll provides an accurate representation of individual, non-duplicative votes. WND earns no income from the poll, does not provide e-mail addresses to any third party and makes no other use of information obtained from cookies.

If you have any problems using the poll please e-mail: poll@wnd.com

If you would like to suggest a poll idea to WND editors, please go to our YOUR BEST POLL IDEAS forum.



Post to this forum!268 post(s)This is page 1. Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... NEXT >
Constitutional Law, Optional? For Who?
Posted by Tool Guy 1776 on Mar 26, 2009 13:31

If this requirement could be filled by an existing document it would have been.
Until this requirement is fulfilled we have an illegal president.
Who is responsible for checking details like Constitutional requirements.
Congress? The same people who were and still are responsible as an oversight body to restrain anyone from harming the "people" of the United States.
Their efforts have allowed and encouraged financial institutions to wreck the Worlds Financial Structure. Just another detail to be ignored. For how much longer? We need to start some where fixing this. The top looks good to me.

| Reply to this post

PLEASE NOTICE:
Posted by Mikaia (mbmonitor) on Mar 13, 2009 09:15

We have 10 visible forums to post to on the WND Polls Home page. We also have 10 or more forums on the WND Forums Home page.

There is no reason to post on the forums that are not active on WND. I will no longer approve of the posts for discussion that are not visible on WND Poll page.

Please take advantage of the forums that are active.


Mikaia
mbmonitor@wnd.com
http://wnd.com

| Reply to this post

Eligibility is Constitutionally ESSENTIAL!
Posted by endtimes7 on Mar 10, 2009 20:24

This issue will NOT go away until it is brought out and certifiably acceptable. Too many Americans are unaware of just how crucial the issue of BHO's birth certificate IS in holding this position as Commander in Chief. We have an usurper as President and I cannot accept him as my president when he cannot present live birth certification. I sympathize with military men and women who do not want to accept this person as their CC when he is most likely NOT an American-born citizen as required by our Constitution. He is in position to defend our rights and has NOT produced the proof to put THIS ISSUE TO REST FOR GOOD! Just show us the documents!

| Reply to this post

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A spy too...
Posted by donbch on Mar 10, 2009 10:51

If Barack Obama has nothing to hide, why won't he produce his birth certificate showing what hospital in Hawaii he was born at and the attending physician? Also, his college transcripts. Did he attend college as a foreign student? And attending school is Kenya, when only Kenyans were allowed to attend.

He seems to be hiding a lot. We patriotic Americans must keep insisting that the above documents be made public. Mr. Obama can stop all the questions just by letting Americans see the required documents. We need to keep fighting for America's democracy
Reply to: Fed Up/Fl
My 5th District Fl. Congresswomen, Ginny Brown-Waite informed me that this illegal stuff was just gossip and Snopes.com (the same one Obama sat on the Board dispensing millions) had verified his BC. I asked since when does Snopes verify things for the Congress! Especially for the Presidency. I was demanding that she and her associates/Congress physically verify all documents pertaining to his birth etc. They won't report because The Bilderbergs own the Media, or our elite participants! His elligibility only seems to matter to us "fools".

| Reply to this post

Obama Birth Certificate
Posted by zow on Mar 10, 2009 10:21

What in the hell is so controversial about asking to see if a president has a valid birth certificate to see if he conforms to the requiremant of the Constitution that he is sworn to uphold ??? Either show it or step down !!!

| Reply to this post

national media finally reporting
Posted by bear1 on Mar 09, 2009 18:22

I would true like to see the MSM report on BO's eligibiity, If they Could actually Tell the Truth, but with thier love affair of BO I really daught that it would be fair and honest and a true Birth Cert.

| Reply to this post

RE: RE: National media!? What national media?
Posted by on Mar 07, 2009 12:54

What mass media is What media? The people upstairs write
the "news" to be reported. If anybody dares stray, it's
bye bye job. Do you really believe that Connie Chung left
to have a baby? She had a baby, but she could not get any
news job until she had been punished long enough and was
let back in. The only newspaper I know about that is not
under fist controlled reporting is The Christian Science
Monitor. No, I'm not a member of that church, but I was
told a few years ago that their paper is totally owned by
that church so is not under the same edicts that other news
medias are. Not dependent on advertising either to stay in
business. Think I will subscribe and see what they are
printing and how different their articles about things being reported are in comparison. Wanting to know the Truth and nothing but the Truth.

Reply to:
Oh Wow! Thank you for your post, very insightful, I could not agree more.

I also agree that Alan Keyes is a great man IMHO. But totally undermined and ignored. Not only by the mass media, but by the Sheeple as well.

| Reply to this post

RE: RE: RE: Rockefeller
Posted by MistieRose on Mar 04, 2009 23:50

I am a school teacher. My college records were viewed by districts to see if I was qualified to be a teacher. I had to show my birth certificate to get a marriage license, passport, to get babtized, enter school as a child. I do not trust anyone who seals a record. Obama has been called a Harvard whiz. Where are the records even showing that he graduated, or even was a good student from Harvard? He was illegit because his father already had a wife if he was born an American citizen. When did he stop doing drugs? He talks in a monitone which makes me believe he is on something, plus he is manic with all his decisions. One speech he rambled...drugs perhaps? Was he involved in homosexual activities? The man is nothing but one big cover up after another. Surprise!! I am a Democrat who never even thought to vote for him.
Reply to: Fed Up/Fl
Yes great post! I've said similar things but you said them articuately! I finally saw the light of who we were fighting in 2005, before that I was blindsided!

| Reply to this post

Un Biased coverage (NOT)
Posted by rightwingredneck on Mar 04, 2009 23:46

Wanna see a real good example of the MSM, check out Keith Olbermanns website. WARNING: Take a healthy dose of Pepto before you go. It is guaranteed to make you hurl! I never really paid the guy much attention (K.O.) but I have never seen such Blatant *&^kissing. He needs to be tried right along with the rest of the "Left" for treason. He's reporting on Obama alright, but you'd think the Lord had issued BO with a new Ten Commandments.

| Reply to this post

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: A spy too...
Posted by Fed Up/Fl on Mar 04, 2009 22:02

My 5th District Fl. Congresswomen, Ginny Brown-Waite informed me that this illegal stuff was just gossip and Snopes.com (the same one Obama sat on the Board dispensing millions) had verified his BC. I asked since when does Snopes verify things for the Congress! Especially for the Presidency. I was demanding that she and her associates/Congress physically verify all documents pertaining to his birth etc. They won't report because The Bilderbergs own the Media, or our elite participants! His elligibility only seems to matter to us "fools".
Reply to: Patriot1775
Dorchester, You're still a Kool-Aid drinking moron and liberal loser who could care less about what happens to this country and its' people than how much money can you make for yourself. Obama never showed any proof to the Congress that he was eligible to hold the office of POTUS. If there had been any documents proving his eligibility shown to Congress, then MSM would shown that documentation on the liberal networks to stop the rumors. As for Congress, most of the representatives are out of work attorneys who have there own skeletons in the closet that they would never truly rock their own political boat to expose another of their kind. Most attorneys that I have had to deal with are immoral people who would sell their soul to get ahead in this world. Obama is no different. As far as who has standing in this matter, it is "We the People" who are suppose run our government through its' representatives and it is about time that we start firing most of our representatives who do not represent the "WILL" of the people (Republican & Democrat). Read your Constitution and study the Federalist Papers, the maybe you will understand what "We the People" are responsible for.

As for the people you call "conspiracy nuts", we are the conservatives who believe in our Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We are asking a legitimate question that should have been asked by the Secretaries of each State before he was allowed on the ballot. Unfortunately, this was not the case, so we have been forced to do what should have been done a year ago. Now, we are exercising our constitutional rights as Americans to protect ourselves from people like Obama who wants to destroy this country and make it something other than the country it has been for over 200 years. Government is NOT the solution to this economic problem; it IS the problem. As it has been in the past and in the present.

| Reply to this post


Post to this forum!268 post(s)This is page 1. Go to page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... NEXT >




Page 1 | Page 2 | Commentary | MoneyNetDaily | G2 Bulletin | About Us | Terms of Use | Privacy | Contact Us | Service Discussion Guidelines |